Dudley's dungeon
Friday, 22 August, 2008 |
by jftsang |
#
#
########
#
---+---
|....(|
|..@..|
######-&...{|
-------
& "Gangway!" @ "Aha, the mailman!" & "I have a parcel for you today, Dudley."
|
#
#
########
#
---+---
|..@.(|
|&....|
######-....{|
-------
@ "Oh good! It must be those scrolls of undead turning I ordered."
|
You open the large
box...
########
#
---+---
|..@.(|
|.....|
&#####-....{|
-------
t - a bobcat corpse @ "..."
|
Meanwhile... .|
|.}}}}}}}.|
|.}}---}}.|
|.}--^--}.|
|.}-^@^|}.|
|.}--^--}.|
|.}}---}}.|
|.}}}}}}}.|
|.........|
@ "Negative rating?!"
|
http://dudley.nicolaas.net
|
|
http://dudley.nicolaas.net
Want to contribute? Write an email to dudley@nicolaas.net!
Powered by Nics
Rating
Average rating: Fair Number of ratings: 38
Comments
Skyrock |
August 22, 2008 00:12
|
First comment: 26 July, 2007 |
41 comments written |
A direct link to the comic in question would have been better... http://xkcd.com/325/
Rated P, not because it consists mostly of an obscure reference (although that doesn't also help), but simply I wasn't the least bit entertained. |
Wellan |
August 22, 2008 00:20
|
First comment: 27 November, 2007 |
247 comments written |
Sorry, but it's not really funny. Also, why would Rodney send Dudley a package (or is this just so obscure that I'm wrong about that), and why invent scrolls of undead turning (the wands work just fine)? |
Wonderer |
August 22, 2008 00:36
|
First comment: 22 March, 2007 |
106 comments written |
MEDIOCRE comic! better than a C but not as good as a C+ - somewhere just under C+
(See: "eBay Feedback Profile for tryork5ifp") |
idontexist |
August 22, 2008 00:56
|
First comment: 19 July, 2008 |
35 comments written |
Hey! I'm going for the worst comic ever here. I give it an E just because i want my comic that i sent a couple weeks ago to be the worst rated ever.
Btw Dion, can you add worst comics to the stats ? |
Callie |
August 22, 2008 01:50
|
First comment: 16 July, 2007 |
31 comments written |
I have to give it an E. |
Quint Sakugarne |
August 22, 2008 01:57
|
First comment: 1 January, 2008 |
233 comments written |
Well, I was entertained. Partly because I was very entertained by that particular xkcd comic. And jftsang did mention that it was an xkcd reference.
Note that a comic can have a 66% approval rating if two out of every three people upvote it! |
hpp3 |
August 22, 2008 02:48
|
First comment: 21 November, 2007 |
38 comments written |
Seriously awesome humour, from the xkcd comic, this comic, and Quint's comment. |
hpp3 |
August 22, 2008 02:51
|
First comment: 21 November, 2007 |
38 comments written |
Also, if that had been Schroedinger's package, the bobcat will have a 50% chance of not being dead. |
Antheridium |
August 22, 2008 07:39
|
First comment: 17 May, 2007 |
442 comments written |
Monster-in-a-box! (It would work like a tricks.) |
Nameless Fairy |
August 22, 2008 09:09
|
First comment: 26 September, 2007 |
22 comments written |
Good comics make memes. Bad comics repeat them.
Guess which category this one falls into? |
SomeoneElse |
August 22, 2008 09:30
|
First comment: 11 September, 2006 |
143 comments written |
The room Dudley's in seems suspiciousluy like the room in Dudley's Dungeon comic number one. Plus there's no such thiong as a of undead turning.
Also, even though I know about xkcd and have read that particular comic, I didn't realise it was a reference until it was pointed out. So it's not a very good reference if it needs to be pointed out to be understood.
Well, that's just my opinion. |
badgerigar |
August 22, 2008 11:12
|
First comment: 22 August, 2008 |
1 comments written |
This isn't an xkcd reference. It is an xkcd ripoff. There is no joke apart from the one made in the original |
T-Jack |
August 22, 2008 14:15
|
First comment: 16 March, 2008 |
52 comments written |
The bad thing: The comic's not funny at all. The good thing: At least the comments are. I'm giving it M only besause of them. |
gneek |
August 22, 2008 20:14
|
First comment: 18 January, 2008 |
159 comments written |
Meh |
Slowpoke |
August 22, 2008 21:02
|
First comment: 27 February, 2007 |
239 comments written |
Good comics make memes. Bad comics repeat them.
I can has new meme plz? Kthxbye. |
Quint Sakugarne |
August 22, 2008 22:21
|
First comment: 1 January, 2008 |
233 comments written |
"This isn't an xkcd reference. It is an xkcd ripoff. There is no joke apart from the one made in the original."
Hey badgerigar, this isn't a ripoff. It's not the same joke as before. It's clearly referencing it. He could have had a live bobcat walk out of the box. Or had the say something about how he hopes people wouldn't mind the one time out of 30 that he slacked off. Or the package should have contained a .
As it stands, it's most definitely a reference, not a ripoff.
And I stand behind my <b>Excellent</b> rating. |
Mighty Tater |
August 22, 2008 22:45
|
First comment: 8 February, 2007 |
15 comments written |
After re-reading it, I chuckled. E it is! |
Slowpoke |
August 23, 2008 01:13
|
First comment: 27 February, 2007 |
239 comments written |
Erm, what I meant to say was, "package contained a lolcat. Would not buy again." |
Bob Catt |
August 23, 2008 01:28
|
First comment: 23 August, 2008 |
1 comments written |
Hilarious comic. Would read again. |
Goldthwait |
August 23, 2008 01:42
|
First comment: 23 August, 2008 |
1 comments written |
t - a bobcat corpse
Hey! Stop spreading rumors about me. |
Squeegy |
August 23, 2008 18:36
|
First comment: 6 August, 2007 |
17 comments written |
Meh. I didn't get the end at all, so I'm gonna go with a Fair. |
acheron |
August 23, 2008 19:35
|
First comment: 1 June, 2004 |
63 comments written |
Meh. It's not bad. (I didn't catch the xkcd ref until it was pointed out either, even though I more or less have all the xkcd comics memorized.) |
Nesman |
August 24, 2008 15:06
|
First comment: 4 January, 2005 |
112 comments written |
See XKCD 325, if you still don't get it. |
zach |
August 25, 2008 16:08
|
First comment: 25 August, 2008 |
2 comments written |
I would rate the xkcd comic as Poor, so easy decision for me. |
Slowpoke |
August 25, 2008 16:40
|
First comment: 27 February, 2007 |
239 comments written |
No new comic this Monday morning, <boo hoo>! |
Ren |
August 27, 2008 15:08
|
First comment: 2 April, 2008 |
35 comments written |
P for Pretty Bad. I read XKCD religiously but didn't get it until the link, and after that it wasn't really good anyway.
See http://qdb.us/151845 |
acheron |
August 28, 2008 14:39
|
First comment: 1 June, 2004 |
63 comments written |
That quote on QDB.us was funnier than this comic. |
Slowpoke |
August 28, 2008 22:03
|
First comment: 27 February, 2007 |
239 comments written |
@ "O Arnie, hear my prayers, we need some new comics."
|
@ |
August 28, 2008 22:21
|
First comment: 26 July, 2004 |
155 comments written |
Since we don't have any new comix, I lower my vote from Mediocre to Poor. |
gneek |
August 29, 2008 06:22
|
First comment: 18 January, 2008 |
159 comments written |
I CAN HAZ NU COMIC PLZ? |
Antheridium |
August 29, 2008 14:58
|
First comment: 17 May, 2007 |
442 comments written |
Taking a bad comic hostage is rather less effective, I'd imagine... |
@ |
August 29, 2008 22:23
|
First comment: 26 July, 2004 |
155 comments written |
In that case I raise this ripoff comic to Excellent. |
MadDawg2552 |
October 10, 2008 19:14
|
First comment: 6 October, 2008 |
69 comments written |
A good comic reference can stand on its own without people needing to know the reference. A great comic reference is funny on its own, but even funnier if you know the reference.
A poor comic reference is neither funny nor even recognized as a reference to said comic without mentioning said comic's name. |
http://dudley.nicolaas.net
Want to contribute? Write an email to dudley@nicolaas.net!
Powered by Nics
|
|