Dudley's dungeon
Friday, 30 November, 2007 |
by Eniteris |
Welcome, ,
to Debug Mode!
#-@~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
-------
@ "Hey. Maybe being a program- mer is better than an adventurer!" You see here a line of code.
|
#
##-------
#-~@~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
-------
You see here a line of code.
|
#
##-------
#-~~@~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
-------
You see here a line of code.
|
#
##-------
#-~~@x~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
-------
Wait, ! There's a bug hiding under a line of code!
|
You die...
##-------
#-~~@x~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
|~~~~~|
-------
The bug bites! The bug bites!
|
------------
/ REST IN \
/ PEACE \
/ \
| |
| killed by |
| a bug |
| * * * |
/\\_/(\/(/\)\//\/|
@ "Maybe not..."
|
http://dudley.nicolaas.net
|
|
http://dudley.nicolaas.net
Want to contribute? Write an email to dudley@nicolaas.net!
Powered by Nics
Rating
Average rating: Excellent Number of ratings: 29
Comments
Antheridium |
November 30, 2007 01:30
|
First comment: 17 May, 2007 |
442 comments written |
The reader laughs!
A lot of games have debug rooms in them, but only Dudley would die in one. |
Mordae |
November 30, 2007 03:31
|
First comment: 11 May, 2007 |
116 comments written |
What do you want to wield? a - an Ada compiler
The Ada compiler welds itself to your hand! You feel stupid. |
itxpurts |
November 30, 2007 04:00
|
First comment: 18 October, 2007 |
6 comments written |
Excellent...
Next thing is a Magic to the Matrix!! |
Wellan |
November 30, 2007 05:06
|
First comment: 27 November, 2007 |
247 comments written |
Now we just need Dudley to hack NetHack. Hilarious! |
G |
November 30, 2007 05:53
|
First comment: 5 October, 2005 |
82 comments written |
Nice |
Dion |
November 30, 2007 09:19
|
First comment: 2 February, 2004 |
100 comments written |
Wellan, see also http://www.nicolaas.net/dudley/index.php?f=20050427 |
A cursed greased -2 Grognor scale mail |
November 30, 2007 18:07
|
First comment: 30 November, 2007 |
1 comments written |
I may be dense, but I'm not sure why the symbol '~' represents the lines of code. I don't know if a perfect symbol exists, but I probably would have gone with '?'. I ask, not to nitpick Grognor-style, but to see if I'm missing an additional layer to the joke. |
Grognor, killed by a newt |
November 30, 2007 18:17
|
First comment: 28 November, 2007 |
19 comments written |
This is great, but ~ is or lava, and grid bugs and uhh... those Zans or Xans or whatever are the only x bugs. |
zem |
November 30, 2007 19:23
|
First comment: 5 December, 2005 |
64 comments written |
Do you want your backtrace identified? |
Antheridium |
November 30, 2007 21:30
|
First comment: 17 May, 2007 |
442 comments written |
x also refers to grid bugs, of course, and I think that's why it was used here. If you look at an x, you'll see the class is used for "magical or fantastic insects". While it's debatable whether it would be funnier to use x or a (and allow Go Team ), it certainly seems appropriate (at least to me) to use the symbol for an imaginary bug to refer to a virtual bug.
Also, I thought or lava was }. (Or it might be {, I can never remember which is the and which is the moat.) The only thing I've ever seen ~ used for is the tail of a long ... perhaps that's the analogy, it's used for a continuous piece of a long program... Or perhaps it indicates that the line is just a snippet, not long enough to take up a full ... or perhaps the author just wanted to use a character that would easily contrast with @ and x, for easier reading. We'd likely be complaining if he used ?, too. |
Purple Koopa |
November 30, 2007 22:38
|
First comment: 20 June, 2006 |
16 comments written |
It's ~ because ~ also represents the tail of a long . |
Grognor |
December 1, 2007 00:03
|
First comment: 4 April, 2007 |
1161 comments written |
I'm so sick of commenting on all these strips.
Rated E for Everyllent. |
Antheridium |
December 1, 2007 04:32
|
First comment: 17 May, 2007 |
442 comments written |
I suppose I should add that if you could find fortune cookie papers without the fortunes, ~ is the symbol I would expect to see for it. Like I said, a snippet not long enough to take up a . |
Antheridium |
December 1, 2007 04:36
|
First comment: 17 May, 2007 |
442 comments written |
...without the cookies, even. Dear me, that was stupid, I guess I should have previewed first. My apologies for hogging the thread. |
Kernigh |
December 1, 2007 05:20
|
First comment: 6 April, 2005 |
349 comments written |
A bug attacked Dudley previously:
http://www.nicolaas.net/dudley/index.php?f=20061225 |
Dav |
December 1, 2007 05:42
|
First comment: 26 June, 2004 |
147 comments written |
Best comment award goes to zem. |
Custard |
December 1, 2007 19:02
|
First comment: 1 December, 2007 |
10 comments written |
Grognor, feel free to stop doing it if you like. We could all stand to read a little less whining anyway. |
Fathead |
December 2, 2007 01:32
|
First comment: 1 April, 2006 |
1136 comments written |
That "I hope" just killed me. I give it an Eee. |
Grognor |
December 2, 2007 23:08
|
First comment: 4 April, 2007 |
1161 comments written |
fortune cookies are longer than scrolls!
Scrolls are usually as simple as "LEP GEX VEN ZEA" |
Antheridium |
December 3, 2007 06:51
|
First comment: 17 May, 2007 |
442 comments written |
That's just the label stuck on the outside, is how I always took it.
I'd like to say that as soon as you unroll the and read the actual formula on it, the magic activates, and that's why you need these labels. (Though they could stand to be a little less cryptic.) However, that's evidently not the case, as you can write a you've only seen but not used. Hmm...
But in any case, going by the number of charges required to write them, some of those scrolls are really long. Genocide, anyone? |
Grognor |
December 6, 2007 21:34
|
First comment: 4 April, 2007 |
1161 comments written |
It takes more magic to write more powerful scrolls!
Thus, more charges.
|
http://dudley.nicolaas.net
Want to contribute? Write an email to dudley@nicolaas.net!
Powered by Nics
|
|